Rotating Header Image


Attorney Philip Berg makes his case, convincingly, that Barack Obama is not Constitutionally qualified for the U.S. Presidency.

Many of us voters have been raising this issue repeatedly and for most of the same reasons that Berg is now pursuing through a federal court case — which Obama has attempted to have dismissed, then postponed when his motion to dismiss was denied — so I am pleased to see more exposure of this potentially incindiary issue (and ongoing likely crime by Obama and the Democratic Party).


THIS COULD BE A GAME CHANGER — from American Thinker

Interesting question posed in comments section at American Thinker, not raised in the Berg video:

Posted by: DanSchwartz – Oct 11, 12:35 PM

One question not raised by Berg was Obama’s trip to Pakistan as a college student. This was not mentioned in either of his two books; but he admitted it in a speech on Sunday, April 5th in San Francisco. This was documented in the New York Times on April 10th at:

The problem is that at time in the early 1980’s, it was unlawful for Americans to travel to Pakistan, so he had to travel there on his Indonesian passport.

250wde_MichelleObama_Nuts And Michelle Obama proves (if the story is true) that she really is monstrous in a phone call to an African news source (African Press International, or, “API”) – a conversation that, if true, affirms the opinions about Michelle Obama that she’s more than a troubled person.

The Obama campaign says it’s “bogus – a lie” as a story (never occurred), yet the media source in Africa says, if contacted, they’ll verify the story and releases their phone number for that purpose: (to call from the USA), 011-4793299739.

From WorldNetDaily’s story about Michelle Obama’s alleged phone call and comments:

The Obama campaign immediately denied the telephone call happened.

Tommy Vietor, a campaign spokesman, told Byron York on the National Review Online blog “The Corner,” the conversation didn’t happen.

“The answer is no, it’s not real, the report is made up. She did not speak to the organization,” Vietor said.

However, in an e-mail to WND, a man who identified himself as API’s “Chief Editor Korikr” confirmed the exchange.

“API hereby confirms to you that the story is true and if the huge interest on this particular story continues, we will post the recording on our website in the next immediate days.

“When we published the story we did not intend to cause any chaos but we are shocked by the huge interest the story is receiving from the Americans and the American media,” he continued.

“Mrs. Obama called us just to ask API to stop joining the mainstream hate online media that is trying to destroy her husband’s opportunity to get the presidency,” he wrote.

275wde_Obama-Acorn-CorruptionFun Let’s see if the Obama-aligned media, so-called, in the U.S. will acknowledge with any seriousness, either story, or both (though the first one is the zinger — Obama’s qualification to be President, or lack thereof, and his lies inorder to seize the Presidency if he isn’t qualified and how it is that any organization in the U.S. could and might exist that would sponsor such corruption [that’d be terrorism-times-infinity]).

Also, the most deplorable negation about the Obama-aligned media is that they’ve ignored this immensely significant story (discussed on more than a few websites by concerned citizens, many of whom have provided professional examination of the Obama-“documents” he’s released and all concluded they were fraudulent).

Obama may not be qualified under our U.S. Constitution for the U.S. Presidency — and just as important a story is why has Obama behaved with pretense that he was qualified if he isn’t (what’s his motivation for lying and in such profound terms).

We appear to be, as a nation, on the cusp of either remaining civilized or else descended into a third-world anarchy. These two stories reflect rotten roots with pretty buds exposed: either we’re intelligent enough to confront and eradicate this sort of decay, or, we aren’t and our collective produce is desperately foul.

Update: article was later reported to be an unreliable report (Michelle Obama rant-call story).

2 C O M M E N T S

  1. gail says:

    I’m “Black” Against Obama Fighter in Tennessee and daily I let my voice be heard on the local radio talk show. I have lost many Friends and gained many enemies, but Obama is a threat to “My Country.”

    This man has his Birth Certificate sealed. WHY? All my life i had to present my birth certificate for SS, Army, College, Jobs.

    Obama is trying to be the President of the U.S, and he won’t let me know anything about him. The Government, including Homeland Security, the FBI should DO their jobs to protect the citizens of the U.S.

    Obama has too many ties to the leftwing of this country and he should be exposed. When Louis Farrakhan announced that Obama was the “Messiah” this should have sent a warning to our government. Why should anyone go to court to force Obama to show his birth certificate when in fact he must prove to be a natural born citizen? What is the President’s responsibility to the People? We the People should not be in fear! If Obama can give money to Acorn and investigate Joe the Plumber, then something is wrong with the system.

  2. -S- says:

    I completely agree with you, gail, all except the being “Black” part. But I DO realize, just like many among Republicans do, that Obama’s waging a racist campaign on racially divisive, if not phoney, issues.

    I mean by that, that, though there do appear a lot of people who are Black who are voting for Obama BECAUSE he’s Black (a racist methodology at work), it’s Obama who is attracting and fanning the flames of that type of racially divisive, racially-motivated “voting.”

    AND it’s because in character, Obama is faulty. He’s corrupt. Look at the corruption he’s aligned and associated with, look at the “strife” he inspires and seems to quite enjoy (laughs about it, seems happier the more strife he’s inciting) (advising supporters to “get in the faces” of Republicans — this is no small incitement), and look at the very basic issues you’ve identified that are also troubling many voters (and which remain preposterously “allowed” or unchallenged — it’s indicative of overall corruption, is my point, not so much as placing demands for proof of legitimacy of a Presidential candidate, which points a big doubt at Congress, among others).