In all seriousness, the Obama so-called speech “gaffes” have gone beyond mere mis-speakage to a point of indicating a nervousness that I suspect is the product of Obama attempting to “cover” or “hide” his actual opinions for ulterior motives. Meaning, he’s not so much bumbling in his ongoing strange statements as he is fumbling in his ability to mislead and what is actually on the man’s mind is peeking through every few statements. So he fumbles in his speech whenever he can’t read a prepared statement: because he’s working to avoid revealing what is actually on his mind and what his opinions really are.
Which is also a way of me writing that Obama could just be revealing that he’s mentally confused about very serious issues and that’s not (at all) admirable from someone who wants to manage the nation’s nuclear football.
Obama doesn’t mangle words in some stuttering such as a speech disorder but actually changes concepts in a misleading, false context. That’s not a lightweight matter because it’s revealing a pattern of deception.
Maybe his campaign’s ongoing “day-after revisions” statements (as to what “Obama actually meant”) are a bit of conscience setting in, but, such day-after revisions are now the norm for Obama and campaign and it indicates serious credibility issues, as to what’s actually on Obama’s mind, not what he’s “misspeaking” when he opens his mouth.
THE OBAMA GAFFE MACHINE ROLLS ON
National Review Online:
“WELL, MAYBE OBAMA’S UNCLE WAS IN THE RED ARMY”
RedState doesn’t mince words as to the general media servicing Obama and his (or, perhaps, their) politics:
“DID I SAY AUSCHWITZ? I MEANT SELMA! OR KABUL! OR…”