suzyrice.com Rotating Header Image

SANDY BERGER AGAIN CLOGS CLINTON CREDIBILITY

250wde_Berger_Lying More accurately, the Clintons continue to clog their own credibility, but they also seem to think that by hammering on through incredible gaffs, their credibility will somehow improve; they deploy the “hiding in plain sight” methodology whatever their foolery is, may be and has been.

However, calling “it” — the Clinton politics and methods — “foolery” is just too lenient, too kind, too fluffy to accurately describe their deeds.

Sandy Berger was rolled into Hillary and Bill’s 2008 Presidential campaign a while ago but the news only gained mainstream foothold yesterday. A comment mentioned an earlier article about Berger in relationship to the Clinton campaign on POLITICO a few days ago and the national news picked it up from there, that Sandy Berger was named by Hillary Clinton as “special advisor” to her campaign. Today Hillary (and Bill) maintain they “have a lot of friends” and “a lot of people advise” the/their campaign/s. Lalalalalala.

Sandy Berger, in statements made in 2003 and in sworn testimony in 2004 before the 911 Commission, said that he “did not have anything in (his) pants” when questioned about classified documents he cryptically removed from the National Archive — specifically although a copy, a copy bearing original notes by former President Bill Clinton that directly involves his questionable interactions as to our U.S. national security.

250wde_Berger_NotLying Berger’s attorney later declared that Berger DID have documents in his pants, among other areas on or attached to his body, but, oh, lalalalala.

The Justice Department let Berger slip by without jail time but jail time he deserved, as does whoever motivated Berger to make these thefts (my guess is the Clintons – one, both). But, lalalalala, Bill Clinton responded in that staccato false laugh he uses (as does Hillary deploy her cackle), saying that Berger was known to be “disorganized” and laughed about what Clinton referred to as Berger’s goofiness, lalalalalala, no harm there, he’s an entertaining boob, as Liberals try to minimize his behaviors, lalalalalala.

But if you doubt my word for it, read the news:

SANDY BERGER: WHAT DID HE TAKE AND WHY DID HE TAKE IT?

SANDY BERGER and THE CLINTON COVER-UP – WHY IT MATTERS (via noliberalspin.townhall.com):

You really have to wonder why Sandy Burgular gave up his law license so quickly to avoid an investigation into his nefarious activities in the National Archives! What WAS that masked man up to? Why did Bubba erupt like Vesuvius when Chris Wallace merely touched on the subject? Like a lion with a thorn in his paw, Bubba roared that Chris and the right-wing were out to get him, etc…

Share

C O M M E N T S : now closed