In Nancy Pelosi’s San Francisco territory, Pelosi was greeted in her latest visit there with a presentation on the beach. I made my revision, seen above, to reflect awareness of the worst problem facing our nation today. Because, impeaching President Bush — the original statement by these folks in San Francisco — is the belly-button study upon the elephant in the room: absence of national security by refusal to secure our borders and remedy the vast irregularities in unbridled immigration to this nation (of both the legal and the illegal kind).
We can impeach or we can solve these problems. With Pelosi’s Congress in place, it looks like they’re going to enable the Bush plans that the Republican Congress stood against. That means, with Pelosi’s Congress, Bush is actaully going to have an easier go of certain plans that only a Republican House stood against. If impeaching Bush is the suggested course of action, then we should also impeach Congress.
Is it not more sensible to place requirements to do the voter’s bidding upon the White House and Congress? Does impeaching any one player ever really make any difference? Allegedly angry voters outed Republicans from Congress recently but unfortunately, those allegedly angry voters elected eager helpers to the very goals and plans that they allege they’re angry about: willing Democrats to assist the very problems about which most voters are, in fact, angry.
Here’s one of those willing enablers now:
House of Representatives Democratic Leader Steny Hoyer of Maryland said on “Fox News Sunday” that immigration was one of the topics discussed when congressional leaders were invited to the White House last week to meet with Bush.
“He (Bush) smiled and he said, ‘You know, I think I’m going to have a lot easier time dealing with you on immigration than I had dealing with the House Republican leadership on immigration,'” said Hoyer.
“I think that’s the case,” said Hoyer, who did not detail the plan.