I think they’re confused as to what number they should dial,
if they could dial, once they realize
that there’s a phone in the booth.
Which they’re in.
Without a clue otherwise.
Read Karl Rove’s original speech in full and in context and excellent commentary by RedState.
Otherwise, where is Hillary Clinton’s commentary about Dick Durbin’s slithering in the United States Senate and why is she not appropriately outraged about that. Karl Rove is big enough to field (and tread water and juggle while whistling “Dixie“) Clinton’s dodge of the issue, I am thinking, but it would be interesting if Clinton could get around to either outrage or lauds — whatever her emotion may be — about Durbin and provide a bit of explanation about either, or both.
At least, if nothing else, we now have on record the most outraged Democrats in our legislature (and otherwise) admitting by their outrage factor that they are, in fact, liberals and that Democrats are, in fact, the various liberal groups who, in fact, wanted the United States to issue indictments and offer counselling to terrorists (“talk therapy,” to which it is sometimes referred) after the events of 09/11 and more…which is, again, exactly what Karl Rove said on June 22, 2005.
If ever there was a case of the truth hurting, of a rage against the hurting truth, this is it: Democrats raging about everything except what matters, and that is, their misguided rage.