What I do know is that it’s interesting as anything to read the massive speculations this morning by the DU all over the place.

Maybe the Pope will spring an announcement…maybe intelligence will show that Kerry received funding from terrorists. Wait, already proven, that last part.

Amazing that what we already know about Kerry hasn’t brought sense to those who plan to vote for him. Truly amazing. They can’t stand him either and yet they’re willing to vote for Kerry because…they hate.

“…Linda Gottfredson, an I.Q. expert at the University of Delaware, called it a creditable analysis said she was not surprised at the results or that so many people had assumed that Mr. Kerry was smarter. ‘People will often be misled into thinking someone is brighter if he says something complicated they can’t understand,’ Professor Gottfredson said.”

I’ve always found that about many humans so completely amazing, that there’s the misperception but assumed often that a complicated, “overspeak” indicates intelligence, while the straightforward, even sparse, response indicates a less intelligent response.

To my experience, it’s entirely the opposite: the simpler, more sparse the information, the more often it is well understood by whoever expresses the point, and, is being communicated more efficiently…the ability to discern and focus on the most significant aspects to a concept and then communicate those, indicates a greater understanding of objective, of information.

Kerry’s bombastic, rambling, unspecific, “Senate speak” method of expressing himself (or whomever) irritates me to such a degree because it emphasizes to me, in my experience, AVOIDANCE, incapacity, inability to make a point, to understand what it is he should or needs to express…so he just says everything possible about everything/anything possible.

Kerry is not the guy to handle the ball, no doubt about it. He’s never impressed me as “intelligent” but he has impressed me as cunning, even nasty. I think he serves himself, and that bespeaks of a level of desperation that will do, say, anything given the moment.

P.S.: So that means I agree with Mrs. Cheney.

INDC talkback…

“”I went to meet with the members of the Security Council in the week before we voted. I went to New York. I talked to all of them to find out how serious they were about really holding Saddam Hussein accountable. – Kerry”

Bet on that.. only a more detailed investigation.
Yes it’s been broke before but pehaphs they’ve got more to run with now. It’s a one day story, though at least it’s simple to get through to people.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/10/24/politics/campaign/24points.html

http://washingtontimes.com/world/20041023-112818-6788r.htm

From LGF talkback…interesting…

“157 leo (dissident view

The Dems-KLA connection is not the actual news. But this weekend’s election in the UN protectorate of Kosovo, which the local Muslims see as a referendum for secession from Serbia, might be that news when its expectedly pro-secession results pop up as a top story on Monday morning. Five years after the war, the quagmire Kerry has been looking for in Iraq can be found in Kosovo, and Balkan Muslims have understood the Madrid attack as an anew call for jihad against Europe while European “peacekeepers” insist the conflict had nothing to do with Islamic terrorism.

This is not like some Dems with no career yet clandestinely dating the enemy in the Vietnam war. This about Dems in government openly renaming the enemy to an ally and putting NATO into the role of a terrorist organization’s airforce.”

http://frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=15577

Tehran John: Pro-Iranian lobby funding KerryWhistleblowers disclose hundreds of thousands of dollars given candidate
Posted: October 14, 2004, 1:00 a.m. Eastern
By Aaron Klein,

You know, Kerry would put Madeleine Albright right back into the Cabinet in her same position as she held under Clinton (or similar), and probably Howard Dean in there somewhere, most of the old Clinton Administration’s Cabinet back in the White House, including Susan Rice (not me, the other one)…hawks under the guise of being liberals, but hawks of the sort as is Kerry a hawk, which is that the United States is the enemy, more or less, in international negotiations. I exaggerate to make a point as to what I mean by “Kerry…as a hawk” and those like him, including Albreicht: they parade a big speech and exhausting language, and yet undermine the concept of an independent U.S. military and foreign policy, hating those in the U.S. who propose such, even the U.S. military. Thus, I describe them as perceiving the U.S. as enemy, and enemy as ally/friend. I’m also now including
Senator Dianne Feinstein in that mix, what with her endorsement of Kerry and comingling with Albright and Rice at the Aspen Institute, along with Teresa H-K’s philanthropy through there. These are the people to my understanding, including Kerry, who should never be involved in the U.S. foreign policy nor the military, but always are. ~Look what they’ve accomplished~.

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=40911