BUT, WHAT IS FUELING IT?
I keep a journal (you are here) inorder to write about whatever it is that is on my mind at any given moment, and to share, particularly, whatever comments and some humor that I want to include in this oh-so-public venue that is the Internet.
I wrote in this journal (you are still here) for many months and if I hadn’t had page stats available in my site logs, I’d have sworn that no one was reading the pages (here, ongoing). What comments were contributed by visitors prior to the Blogger Comment feature being available as is now have been whisked away to a saved text file, so, to anyone newly visiting (here), my earlier entries (here) might look like an auditorium with empty seats.
But, no, in actuality, more like a field with open spaces.
That is, this place was just an open space, but not forlorn, especially if you know my penchant for wilderness. The point is that I write in this public journal but haven’t gotten too involved in popularity measures as to readership and site visits and all, well publicized site-features-sites that mention what list which site is on and why by popularity measure. Although I do check my site stats, I admit that.
As to fear and fueling fear, and fear being that to fear fear is the fear itself, I’ve been considering musing over the personality of Teresa Heinz Kerry for a while now but also admit that I fear to do so, fear unknown but possible repurcussions, fear the fear of fearing a silencing through unpopularity among those who measure worth by popularity measures and indexes; and, as emphasis here, to not recognize that there are forces that harm others is to be unaware to the point of not surviving.
Which I don’t, as I’ve explained, fear popularity on a social-mix level as to journaling, but rather, when discussing a person of such significant economic interest as is T.H.K., there may exist economic repurcussions (she is apparently, everywhere financially — it isn’t my imagination — the more I read about her financial interests and “philanthropies” [an interesting way of describing financial interests], the more fear I fear and the greater is my pause at even mentioning opinion about the person, about the resources she commands and people she influences).
There’s a list here beside me on my monitor as I write, full of names, organizations to which T.H.K. contributes, the lists of relationships in our Senate, nation, world — and people wonder why ordinary citizens such as myself often worry about our privacy — reading the list of Advisors and Panel Members in the various organizations that are funded by the Heinz Foundation makes me, seriously here, worry. Who in our country and world could not be adversely affected by this amount of personal wealth, through a myriad of various methods?
I know that I was not at all comfortable with the John and Teresa Heinz Kerry appearance recently on “Larry King Live” (CNN, July 10, 2004, link here results in a transcript of that broadcast) but I wasn’t exactly sure why. Persons of her wealth are nearly impossible to deny for nearly everyone else unless you are of similar wealth yourself. Hearing her say that she “doesn’t give a s**t” (in reference to what people may think of her in regards to her name, among other things), reading how her house in Pennsylvania is furnished in ordinary things (which we public peoples know because that’s what’s written in certain media sources that she also owns a part of), that she regards herself as “an African American (without the hyphen)” and says her friends regard her so (since she grew up in Africa, although she is a European) — these sort of ongoing “I am all things” statements for political purposes, seeing what I felt was her paranoia on the CNN appearance, a sort of emotional discomfort at being asked to respond to anyone’s questions about anything, and more — I generally was uncomfortable with this person, and wasn’t entirely sure why.
Which only increased my sense of discomfort — which is where my mention of fear comes into things here — because, like it or not, she’s asking (?) people to allow her into a leadership position that is even more privileged than where she already is. Anyone taking control of the Executive Branch of the United States assumes a pinnacle in our world.
I felt — emotional response here — that T.H.K. on that CNN appearance was impatient with Americans, as if she couldn’t quite manage to fully tolerate the wait-out process of being chosen, selected, as if she wanted to wave her arm and just announce a decision: “my John is the President and can’t we just move on from there now” sort of desire permeating her visit. In her own words, didn’t “give a s**t.”
Which is how, certainly, a person of that amount of wealth lives life: “here, there, that, this, go, come, buy, sell, leave, call, don’t call, now, then, knock, enter, yes, no.” Not like there’s any cause for insecurity, in nearly any situation — wealth provides many personal liberties of movement and action that aren’t available otherwise. The downside of that is that wealth also provides a greater liklihood of not needing to ask for much from most others, but to command what it is you want into being, for a price. Philanthropy is good — don’t get me wrong here — but accompanied with a socially denigrating attitude doesn’t seem like generosity so much as it seems like a statement of intent: “do it this way, here’s the money, do it now.”
Philanthropy as wish fulfilment, perhaps. Which, again, isn’t inherently a bad thing, but can be a dangerous, even fearful, thing if done for certain interests that maneuver a population where it would not ordinarily go.
I get the impression from T.H.K. that the White House wouldn’t be her home if John Kerry was elected to the Presidency, so much as it would provide her with a utility, and I felt fear at that, as I do this morning, looking over the long arm of her potentially fearful, financial reach.
I pause, and I pause with this. It is really important to read the small print here — can be great things put into place on behalf of humanity, can be other things put into place, but the key issue is, why the U.S. Presidency?
Aspen Strategy Group
(Co-Chairmen: Joseph S. Nye, Brent Scowcroft; Members include Senator Dianne Feinstein, Chuck Hagel, San Nunn, Zoe Baird, Madeleine Albright and more)
(which funds MoveOn.org, among others).
– – – – ABOUT WHICH, following is an opinionated but significant article, which every voter ought to read before approaching the polls: – – – –
“Teresa Heinz Kerry: Bag Lady for the Radical Left” By Ben Johnson, Front Page Magazine, February 13, 2004
With Matt Drudge’s recent revelation that John Kerry is as faithful to his second wife as he was to his old Vietnam “brothers,” the senator’s presidential campaign may depend more than ever on the actions of his wife, Teresa Heinz Kerry. While the mainstream media has thus far overlooked the alleged infidelity, media outlets have also overlooked a far more important story: The former Mrs. John Heinz is also in bed — financially — with the radical Left.
Teresa Heinz Kerry has financed the secretive Tides Foundation to the tune of more than $4 million over the years. The Tides Foundation, a “charity” established in 1976 by antiwar leftist activist Drummond Pike, distributes millions of dollars in grants every year to political organizations advocating far-Left causes. The Tides Foundation and its closely allied Tides Center, which was spun off from the Foundation in 1996 but run by Drummond Pike, distributed nearly $66 million in grants in 2002 alone. In all, Tides has distributed more than $300 million for the Left. These funds went to rabid antiwar demonstrators, anti-trade demonstrators, domestic Islamist organizations, pro-terrorists legal groups, environmentalists, abortion partisans, extremist homosexual activists and open borders advocates.
During the years 1995-2001, the Howard Heinz Endowment, which Heinz Kerry chairs, gave Tides more than $4.3 million. The combined Heinz Endowments (composed of the Howard Heinz Endowment and the Vira I. Heinz Endowment) donated $1.6 million to establish the Tides Center for Western Pennsylvania, a Pittsburgh office of the San Francisco-based Tides Center. Since that time, the local branch has tirelessly pushed an anti-business agenda in the name of “preserving the environment.” However, it is the Tides Foundation’s national organization whose connections are most disconcerting.
The Tides Foundation is a major source of revenue for some of the most extreme groups on the Left. Tides allows donors to anonymously contribute money to a host of causes; the donor simply makes the check out to Tides and instructs the Foundation where to forward the money. Tides does so. The Tides Center will even manage a left-wing project, for a nominal fee. Drummond Pike told The Chronicle of Philanthropy, “Anonymity is very important to most of the people we work with.” That becomes understandable when one views the list of Tides grant recipients. And who are the beneficiaries of this money?
The Antiwar Movement
Senator John F. Kerry has gone far with his nuanced view of Operation Iraqi Freedom. He voted for the war resolution but specified a litany of conditions the Bush administration must meet before he would support combat, then proceeded to vote against funding troops already in harm’s way — then claimed he had always supported the president when Saddam Hussein was captured. The grant recipients of the Tides Foundation, to which Kerry’s wife has steered millions of dollars in “charitable” funds, understand no such nuance.
Tides established the Iraq Peace Fund and the Peace Strategies Fund to fund the antiwar movement. These projects fueled such hysterical protest organizations as MoveOn.org, the website that recently featured two separate commercials portraying George W. Bush as Adolf Hitler. (Howard Dean, not Kerry, won MoveOn.org’s “virtual primary.”)
The antiwar movement often boasted that MoveOn.org and the radical website Indymedia provided them “alternate media coverage.” Indymedia, an enormous news and events bulletin board with local pages in most of the world?s major cities, provided a vital link for radical activists often with violent agendas to coordinate their protests. Indymedia received $376,000 from the Tides Foundation.
The Institute for Global Communications is another leftist communications facilitator that received Tides grant money. IGC, which during the 1990s was the leading provider of web technology to the radical Left, links to “recommended sites” such as the War Resisters League (a group whose purpose is enabling peaceniks to refuse to pay taxes) and the leftist American Friends Service Committee. Most disturbing is the link to Ramsey Clark’s International Action Center, which has supported Slobodan Milosevic and North Korean strongman Kim Jong-Il. The IAC is the force behind International ANSWER, which sponsored the major antiwar (and anti-Bush) rallies before the invasion of Iraq. When ANSWER was outed as a Communist organization, United for Peace and Justice, headed by longtime Communist Party member Leslie Cagan was created as a “moderate” alternative. UFPJ is also a Tides grant recipient. The Tides-funded “A Better Way Project,” which opposed war in Iraq, also coordinated efforts of United for Peace and Justice and the Win Without War Coalition. The celebrity-laden Win Without War Coalition, along with the Bill Moyers-funded Florence and John Schumann Foundation, ran full-page ads in the New York Times opposing the War on Terrorism. This will not be the last overlapping of far-Left causes.
The Islamist Front
Immediately after 9/11, Tides formed a “9/11 Fund” to advocate a ?peaceful national response? to the opening salvos of war. Part of the half-million dollars in grants the 9/11 Fund dispersed went to the New York Gay and Lesbian Anti-Violence Project to protect the rights of homosexual Arabs. The Foundation replaced the 9/11 Fund with the “Democratic Justice Fund,” which was established with the aid of George Soros’ Open Society Institute. (Currency speculator and pro-drug advocate Soros is, like Teresa Heinz Kerry, a major contributor to Tides, having donated more than $7 million.) The Democratic Justice Fund seeks to ease restrictions on Muslim immigration to the United States, particularly from countries designated by the State Department as “terrorist nations.”
Tides has also given grant money to the Council for American Islamic Relations. Ostensibly a “Muslim civil rights group,” CAIR is in fact one of the leading anti-anti-terrorism organizations within the Wahhabi Lobby, with links to Hamas. CAIR regularly opposes and demonizes American efforts to fight terrorism, claiming, for instance, that Homeland Security measures are responsible for an undocumented surge in ?hate crimes.?
CAIR officials have reason to fight Bush’s anti-terrorism measures: all too many CAIR officials are on the record supporting terrorism. CAIR Executive Director Nihad Awad openly stated in 1994, “I am a supporter of the Hamas movement.” Community Affairs Director Bassem K. Khafagi has been arrested for visa and bank fraud. Randall Royer, a Communications Specialist and Civil Rights Coordinator at CAIR, was arrested along with a group of Islamic radicals in Virginia for allegedly planning jihad. CAIR has defended terrorist ?charities? shut down by the Bush administration. Every few months some CAIR campus official is arrested for aiding and abetting terrorism.
The Legal Matrix
The Tides Foundation has funded a number of the pillars of the radical legal establishment. Chief among these is the National Lawyers Guild, which began as a Communist front organization and is proud of its lineage. At its recent convention last October, the concluding speaker was Lynne Stewart, an indicted terrorist NLG lawyer arrested for helping her client — convicted 1993 World Trade Center bombing mastermind Sheikh Omar Abdel Rahman — communicate with his terrorist cells in Egypt. In her speech, Stewart said she and her NLG comrades were carrying on a proud tradition of their forebears, past and present:
“And modern heroes, dare I mention? Ho and Mao and Lenin, Fidel and Nelson Mandela and John Brown, Che Guevara who reminds us, ‘At the risk of seeming ridiculous, let me say that the true revolutionary is guided by a great feeling of love.’ Our quests like theirs are to shake the very foundations of the continents.”
More recently, the NLG has endorsed the “March 20 call to End Colonial Occupation from Iraq to Palestine Everywhere” organized by International ANSWER, and has posted a petition for ?Post-Conviction Relief? for convicted cop-killer Mumia Abu-Jamal.
Tides? Peace Strategies Fund has funneled money to the Center for Constitutional Rights. The CCR was stablished by Sixties radical William Kunstler, defender of the Chicago 8, and Arthur Kinoy. The two also had plans to establish a new Communist Party. Executive Director Ron Daniels has been honored by the Communist Party USA for his work. Daniels also has a long and cordial relationship with racist, anti-Semitic ?poet laureate? Amiri Baraka. Since 9/11, CCR has channeled its efforts into fighting every effective Homeland Security measure. They have opposed increasing the government’s ability to wiretap Islamists suspected of plotting terrorism and moaned the sequestering of terrorist detainees at Guantanamo Bay was an unexcusable form of “racial profiling.” CCR President Michael Ratner has portrayed American soldiers as the offenders, guilty of 9/11 by their Middle East policy and guilty of keeping Islamist killers “shackled, hooded and sedated during the 25 hour flight from Afghanistan.” CCR has also defended Lynne Stewart’s “innocence” in aiding Sheikh Rahman?s Islamic Jihad.
Tides also funds the Alliance for Justice, a group dedicated to stopping Bush judicial appointees (a cause John Kerry can agree wholeheartedly endorse). Other Tides grants have gone to the Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights and the Asian Law Caucus.
The Tides Foundation has funded the Ruckus Society, a group of anarchist Greens who rioted and looted Seattle during the 1999 World Trade Organization riots. The Tides Center of Western Pennsylvania, established in Pittsburgh with Heinz Family funds, advocates for environmentalist measures that have helped put holes in the Rust Belt’s economy.
Tides money has also squashed free speech. Thanks to complaints generated by the Tides-funded Environmental Working Group, ABC cancelled a John Stossel piece exposing the misleading nature of environmental advocacy in public elementary schools.
Greenpeace is a well-known Tides grant recipient. Greenpeace is best known for its illegal actions, endangering humans in order to make a point about the environment. Tides gave Greenpeace a quarter of a million dollars over ten years.
Lest one think only Tides’ money is going to radicals, not funds directly controlled by Teresa Heinz Kerry, remember that Heinz money has repeatedly found its way to the Earth Island Institute. On September 14, 2001, the Institute’s website bore the headline ?U.S. Responds to Terrorist Attacks with Self-Righteous Arrogance.?
Heinz family philanthropic funds have also had some dubious effects on the presidential race. The League of Conservation Voters has recently endorsed John Kerry’s presidential campaign. The Heinz Family Foundation gave LCV at least $20,000 and donated almost $250,000 to a member of the LCV board.
Perhaps this circular rotation of cash and endorsements should not surprise anyone.
The grant-making institutions of the Left and their feverish recipients ultimately form an amorphous, leftist entity. One never needs to search very far to find connections between a leftist foundation and extreme advocacy groups. Teresa Heinz Kerry, George Soros, Bill Moyers and the Ford Foundation fund the Tides Foundation/Center; Tides funds the National Lawyers Guild, CAIR, MoveOn.org and United for Peace and Justice; those organizations then unite in fluid coalitions to protest against their common political enemies (Republicans). Ultimately, their representatives end up on Bill Moyers’ PBS programs or active within the Democratic campaigns of their fundraisers. Between now and the election, these organizations will run constant interference for the Democratic presidential nominee (presumably Kerry himself): they will march en masse against the Bush administration again and again; they will file more lawsuits against the administration’s Homeland Security measures, decry any effective response to terrorism, claim the United States is guilty of slaughtering Iraqi civilians and petition leftist judges to open America’s borders to Islamist terrorists. After they help his election, President Kerry will be indebted to them. And then they will insist he begin implementing their political agenda.
Moreover, they will have a close ally in the East Wing of the White House, an ally more intimately tied to them than she is to her (second) husband. (She only adopted his last name and political party registration less than 18 months ago. “Politically, it’s going to be Heinz Kerry,” she recently said. “But I don’t give a sh-t, you know?”) Teresa Heinz Kerry will play a potent role in saving her second husband?s presidential campaign now — as Hillary Clinton did in 1992, and again during her husband?s impeachment. Like Hillary, in return for her service, Heinz may demand a place at the table for her pet causes. Caveat emptor.